Historian and persistent Lincoln critic Thomas DiLorenzo explains (in LewRockwell.com) how Mr. Beck has distorted history in his defense of Abraham Lincoln -- which is, at best, ironic, given the often controversial truth Mr. Beck has expressed on other historical subjects.
Specifically, Prof. DiLorenzo cites these falsehoods:
- Mr. Beck refers to the Confederate Constitution as the "Slaveholders' Constitution." As Mr. DiLorenzo points out, and I can confirm from my own reading, the Confederate Constitution was almost identical to that of the United States, Where it differed, it further limited the powers of the federal government by limiting its President to one six-year term, giving its President a line-item veto (a power that state governors were beginning to receive in state constitutions at the time), outlawing protectionist tariffs and subsidies to corporations, and removing the "General Welfare" clause.
- Mr. Beck echoes the widely-held misconception that the War between the States was about slavery. It was not. It was about states' rights. Granted, the Confederates used states' rights to protect slavery -- but the difference is important, because states' rights covers a whole lot of territory that has nothing to do with slavery -- and as Prof. DiLorenzo points out, the strongest defense of slavery at the time came from Lincoln himself, in support of the Corwin Amendment. Lincoln didn't care about the slaves -- he wanted only to preserve the Union for the benefit of the New York bankers who supported him!
- Mr. Beck has "adminrably" (to Prof. DiLorenzo) attacked the notion of "collective salvation" in every context except Lincoln's. As Prof. DiLorenzo points out, the spirit of the age in the North was of collective salvation -- by purifying the lives of the people as a whole through the temperance movement, abolition of slavery, and the abolition of Roman Catholicism.
Glenn Beck urges his listeners not to take his word for it, but to research the facts for themselves. I agree. Especially when it comes to the facts about the War between the States, which Mr. Beck insists on distorting in the service of neoconservative statism.
2 comments:
I, too, have found Beck's misconceptions about Lincoln and the War Between the States disconcerting, and I don't sense that he would be open to learning the truth about Lincoln and the War. He idolizes Lincoln, and those kinds of crushes die hard. But, he is hardly alone in this--the history of the War has been co-opted, for the most part, by the Yankees, and the truth about Lincoln has been largely white-washed by the same Yankees. One can only hope for numerous individual conversions and epiphanies.
Beck's illusions regarding Lincoln is part and parcel of the fraudulent fabric woven around the 'civil rights' agenda including the deification of known plagiarist, Communist MLK.
Like your site Ohio Republic, found you via your posting of the death of Eliz wright, RIP.
Post a Comment