We face many issues in national politics today. Building our
economic base to employ our people, resolving our foreign wars, maintaining
value in our currency, ensuring access to health care, and ensuring the stability
of Social Security and Medicare, are just a few of them. We hear debates
between candidates that offer many approaches to these and other issues.
However, all of these discussions boil down to one burning
issue. Its resolution will determine how, and how well, the others will be
addressed. It is this: Do we have the
confidence to govern ourselves?
Those who have that confidence favor local solutions,
personal responsibility, defense at home, and entrepreneurship. They share
Thomas Jefferson's vision of a nation of farmers and artisans, living perhaps
more modestly, but in harmonious and spiritually satisfying relationships with
God and their neighbors. They want to enjoy the wealth that they have created through
their own efforts. They want charity to come from the heart as they cheerfully
give of their bounty. Jeffersonians seek impartial justice. They seek the
highest expression of human creativity and service. They are willing to accept the risks of
financial insecurity in exchange for the blessings of liberty.
Those who lack that confidence favor top-down solutions,
collectivism, empire-building and corporate investment. They share Alexander
Hamilton's vision of a wealthy and powerful nation that builds on the
sacrifices of its people. They find that
religion and tradition hinder progress. Their notion of charity is doling out
money from the government as it confiscates the work of others. Hamiltonians
seek a perversion of justice that favors their friends. They seek productivity
and a strong bottom line above everything else, and condition the people to
accept the loss of liberty in the name of personal security.
This burning issue has been with us since 1787. In the early
years of the Republic, the clash between the Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian
visions provided a creative tension that helped build the nation. When Andrew
Jackson shut down the Bank of the United States, the Jeffersonians prevailed,
but only for a generation. Abraham Lincoln's crusade to "save the Union"
supposedly resolved the issue for all time, as the Hamiltonians gained, and
continue to hold, the upper hand.
Today, we see where Hamiltonian corporatism has taken us. The
federal government has nearly destroyed the initiative of the people and the
states to solve their own problems. It has confiscated the wealth of its people
in taxes and destroyed the desire to create new business opportunities. American
manufacturing has become a faint memory of the past, as its jobs and money have
been exported to other lands. The Hamiltonians have built a "nanny
state" that has even turned many of our adults into spoiled children
living as its dependents; instead of the productive, contributing people God
meant us to be. It has brought us to economic ruin. The near future is likely
to bring poverty for the majority, hyperinflation, slavery to the state, mass frustration,
and revolution.
The differences between Democrat and Republican,
"conservative" and "liberal" are no longer relevant. Both
Republicans and Democrats are Hamiltonians. The Jeffersonians have been
relegated to minor parties, Tea Parties, media obscurity; and being informed by
their self-appointed betters that they and their Presidential candidate, Ron
Paul, are "wingnuts" unworthy of being reported in the media, let
alone enjoying a place at the table.
The Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian visions are utterly
incompatible. Those who would harmonize the two positions might as well try to make
a compromise between good and evil. The only people who benefit from a powerful
national government are bankers, the military-industrial and medical-insurance
complexes, and the politicians they can buy in Washington. The rest of us not
only suffer financially, we suffer from the wasteful loss of lives in wars that
have nothing to do with defense, and everything to do with greed.
Albert Einstein once defined insanity as doing the same
thing over and over, and expecting a different result. Every election in the
last sixty years has replayed the same struggle. Yet, regardless of which party
has been in power, the result has been the same: more power and more money to
Washington, less freedom and less opportunity for us. We keep hoping against
hope that things will be better after the next election. We should have learned
by now that elections alone cannot fix a corrupt system.
Can we cure our own insanity? Right now, we can work with
our state legislators to defend our interest through nullification and
secession, but this opportunity will not last long. We can assert the self-confidence
to rule ourselves and to cultivate the virtues we need to maintain a free
society. Or we can settle for the tyrant who promises security, even after he
begins to jail and murder us by the tens of thousands. Do not say it cannot
happen here. We are human. We have known for thousands of years that our
actions will eventually bring predictable consequences. The laws of human
behavior do not respect "American exceptionalism."
This is the burning issue: do we have the confidence to rule
ourselves? Its resolution will determine how, and how well, the others will be
addressed.
No comments:
Post a Comment