In my update to yesterday's post, I addressed the conspiracy theory (actually well-grounded in fact) that the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9-11 was not only the attack by commercial jetliners, but a controlled demolition as well. This has led to a Facebook conversation with a skeptic (whose name I am withholding), which I thought deserved a larger audience.
Skeptic: Who set the charges?
I indicated in my post, we do not know. If it was a false-flag attack
(conspiracy theory alert), it would probably have been done by
undercover CIA operatives, possibly agents of al-Qaeda on the CIA
payroll, as suggested by my link to Michael Chussodovsky [director of the Canadian think tank Global Research, often quoted in this space]. I do not know
-- we may never know.
Our own CIA was in on destroying two of the most expensive buildings in
the world and killing thousands of people and doing incalcuable harm to
the American economy. okay, gotcha.
know it's hard to believe. I get that. The problem is that our federal
government has been manipulated for years (I'm not sure how many) by
people intent on using it for their own benefit at the expense of the
rest of us. These people have no problem with murdering thousands (even
hundreds of thousands, if you include Iraqis and Afghans) and cleaning
millions of Americans out of their savings (through bank and currency
manipulations) to maintain their wealth acquired through an imperialist
American foreign policy. I'm not speculating about Jews, Illuminati, and
Freemasons -- I'm talking about New York bankers (and by extension, the
Federal Reserve Bank, which prints our money), arms merchants, and
people like George Soros, a billionaire who profited heavily from our
moratorium on oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico (by buying into a
Brazilian oil company that is drilling in the Atlantic and ... the Gulf
of Mexico), and is trying to replicate on the dollar his feat of
profitably crashing the British pound about a decade ago -- effectively
stealing billions in savings from the British people. [To which I should have added a host of very corrupt Congressmen, like inside traders John Boehner and Nancy Pelosi and those who donate heavily to their campaigns.] The endgame is to
reduce all but a small elite of the American people to poverty, so they
will willingly enslave themselves to the rich that remain in order to survive. It serves
their interest to have Americans more interested in football, Lindsay
Lohan, and Dancing with the Stars, and in what would be (but for Ron
Paul) a meaningless Republican primary, than to understand what is really
A future historian might well entitle their work on the last fifty years, While American Slept: The decline and fall of the United States of America.
Wednesday night, I attended a meeting of an organization of which I have been a member for sixteen years. Before it started (it is a small group), I briefly went over the Defense Appropriation Bill's detainment provisions and their implications (essentially what I wrote Nov. 29), and asked them if this was the kind of government they really wanted to pledge their allegiance to (They know I have not recited the Pledge of Allegiance since I joined them). And again, even with this warning, I remained the only one not to stand up for the pledge. Our people are very confused, and I am beginning to wonder what, if anything, will shake them out of the myth that we still live, and always will live, in a "sweet land of liberty."
My allegiance to the United States government is conditional on its fidelity to the Constitution, which represents the basic principles of our Founding Fathers. My desire for Ohio independence is to replace that government with a smaller one that is faithful to the same principles, as the Ohio Constitution is (in some ways better than the U.S. Constitution). If we see a miracle next year in the election of a President and Congress who are faithful to the Constitution, I will reconsider my position, but I am not confident that such a miracle will happen.