Friday, December 16, 2011

Blunt truth of the day

From Jennifer Smith, political director of the Franklin County Libertarian Party, via Facebook:
Just so that everyone knows what our civil-liberties-stomping president just signed: ANYONE who fits a very broad definition of activist (Tea Partiers and Occupiers, for example) can be swept to Guantánamo Bay by the MILITARY. No trial. No due process. No police. No proof of anything. If you know any Obama supporters, share this story with them. If they STILL support him, then you know they're war mongering, anti-civil rights bigots. Because this is it.
The following article, which Jennifer linked, is to a Politico piece about the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 being sent to the White House for signature.

The article states that President Obama lifted his veto threat when it became clear that Congress had the votes to override. I am not surprised. Please note (and I am repeating myself): The President's signature to this legislation will provide ample grounds for declaring Ohio's independence (See Trigger #1 on the right sidebar). If we value our freedom at all, we must act to ensure that this provision of law never touch otherwise law-abiding citizens within the State of Ohio. First step: Press our state legislators to NULLIFY Sections 1033 and 1034 of the Defense Appropriations Act of 2012. If this effort fails, then a declaration of independence will be justified.

Update Dec. 16: Another friend of mine on Facebook reports that he struggled for 11 years to obtain U.S. citizenship for his wife, who was born in the Soviet Union. Now he feels that they are no better off than before.


PAJ said...

So, the entire Obama (leftist) agenda is an outrage.

Harold Thomas said...

That may be overgeneralizing a bit, but certainly his national "security" agenda is outrageous!

Barga said...

While it is obvious that the act violates the constitution, I don't think it triggers #1 on your list (which, for the record, is pretty close to what triggers me finally believing states have rights).

Until the courts rule, we can't say that this has usurped, trumped, or anything of the like to the constitution. As the courts are likely to say "Hahahahaha, ex parte milligan, hahahahhaha," this act is, while stupid, non-effective